Absolutely! Fights are arranged for the enjoyment of the fan, but to ultimately determine the better of two fighters, offensively and defensively. Even though fights stopped due to a cut because the fighter is rendered “unfit to fight” may prematurely end a fight maybe disappointing to the fan may be disappointing, nothing can be taken away from the victor. Certain organizations, RIP PRIDE, EliteXC, and IFL do/did not allow vicious elbows to rain down in from the mount or to graze the face in the clinch, yet the UFC allows one of the hardest body parts to inflict pain on the opponent.
Many fans have expressed interest to ban elbows in the UFC. These people maintain this point of view for any number of reasons, mainly because they are too brutal(amount of blood caused by these gruesome gashes) or end fights prematurely with out really determining the ‘most talented’ fighter.
Elbows should NOT be banned. A vicious cut may cause a fighter to struggle to maintain energy and focus, but the bottom line is that a fighter should be able to defend against all strikes.
If you don’t want to get elbowed, avoid getting put on your back and if you end up on your back keep a close guard or stand up! Fighters should be able to get out of positions that allow the other fighter to rain down elbows. If a fighter can’t avoid elbows, they probably weren’t going to win the fight anyway, which removes one of the main arguments of elbow nay sayers.
Fan beware the UFC does not allow knees to the head of a downed opponent, foot stomps or kicks to the groin which all could very well be part of a fighters arsenal, the ladder being the worst of the three, but these strikes are not allowed. If they banned elbows, what is next, high kicks, uppercuts and hooks(all have KO potential)?
Maybe down the road the UFC will ban elbows in order to prevent fountains of blood and possibly enter the ‘main stream’ media event era, but for now let’s enjoy the fights and let the best fighter win, elbows included!